A crisis erupted in the 1830s over nullification. Which of the following does not describe an aspect of nullification?

A. States could invalidate federal legislation.
B. States could prevent federal legislation from being enforced within their boundaries.

A. Because states nullify laws by not allowing them to be passed through in the state

Answered by promiseufomadu | 2024-06-10

In the process of nullification , states can prevent federal **legislation **from being **enforced **within their boundaries . Therefore the correct option here is a.
What do you understand by the term nullification?
Nullification can be understood as a **constitutional theory **that individual states can **invalidate **federal laws or **judicial **decisions that seem **unconstitutional **and it has been **controversial **since its inception in early **American **history.
**Three **prominent **attempts **have been made there by states at nullification in American history . The first is Kentucky's attempt to nullify the **Alien **and **Sedition **Acts in 1798, the **second **was South Carolina's attempt to nullify two federal tariff laws in 1832 and the third was **Arkansas's **attempt to nullify **Brown **v. Board of Education (1954) in 1957.
Nullification's **legitimacy **as a constitutional theory was **rejected **in the above-mentioned instances. These three **examples **make us understand nullification in **historical **and constitutional contexts .
Learn more **nullification **from here:
https://brainly.com/question/11182059
#SPJ2

Answered by ranjithgowdavt | 2024-06-16

Both options A and B describe aspects of nullification, with A stating that states could invalidate federal legislation and B stating that states could prevent its enforcement. Both are correct, indicating the struggles over state's rights during the Nullification Crisis in the 1830s. Therefore, there isn't any option here that does not describe an aspect of nullification accurately.
;

Answered by ranjithgowdavt | 2024-09-05