Sure, if she actually did die because of poisoning.
The case of Henrietta Lacks and her HeLa cells exemplifies a complex intersection of ethics, science, and medical advancements. Henrietta Lacks, a young African American woman, was diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital where her cells were discovered to be immortal without her consent. These cells have contributed to countless medical breakthroughs yet, the Lacks family has not received compensation for their use. The ethical considerations involve issues of consent, acknowledgment, and equity within the realms of scientific research and commercialization.
Whether the Lacks family should be compensated is a nuanced question that contemplates the balance of scientific progress and the rights of individuals from whom biological contributions are sourced. Despite her significant contribution to modern medicine, the lack of consent and subsequent financial gain by biomedical industries without equitable acknowledgment or compensation to Henrietta Lacks's estate raises fundamental ethical questions about the use of human tissues in research and who stands to benefit from these scientific endeavors.
The case of Henrietta Lacks raises significant ethical questions about consent and compensation in biomedical research. Her cells, taken without permission, contributed extensively to medical advancements, yet her family has not received any financial benefits despite the commercial gains generated from her cells. The debate on compensation touches on issues of ethics, equity, and acknowledgment of individual contributions to science.
;
Jawaban:1. c. seven2. d.saturday and Sunday3. b. Tuesday4. c Friday5. d. Monday to friday