an experiment that disproves a hypothesis can be useful because even though it is wrong it might lead you to more questions or ideas for new experiments or even an idea of what a better hypothesis might be or a better way to do the experiment. This is a terrible run on sentence but my point is that just because something is wrong doesn't mean it can't give you information. Its like how a a graph with no trend would still be useful even if it doesn't support what you thought. Hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of scientists have made mistakes but most of the time their wrong hypothesis has shown them more than a right hypothesis would have and sometimes even leads you to something bigger and better then what you were even trying to find in the first place. Sorry this was so long its just that i just recently had to write a paper on this and so i have a lot of ideas. Hope this helped! :)
Experiments that disprove a hypothesis can be useful because they offer insights on inaccurate assumptions and contribute to refining the hypothesis. They also contribute to the scientific knowledge base and help in guiding future research. ;
Experiments that disprove a hypothesis are valuable in science as they reveal inaccuracies, refine our understanding, guide future research, and validate the scientific process. These experiments encourage deeper exploration into other influencing factors and aid in the iterative nature of scientific inquiry. Ultimately, they contribute significantly to advancing scientific knowledge.
;
Jawaban:Penjelasan:Kumpulan Filter Cantik yang Paling Cocok untuk Kamu. Temukan berbagai filter menjadi cantik yang cocok dengan kamu! Yuk, coba semua efeknya ...