Why does the average voter engage more in retrospective voting than in prospective voting?
A. Retrospective voting is necessary since candidates rarely discuss their policies.
B. Retrospective voting has proven to be the best way to elect candidates to office.
C. Retrospective voting does not require as much time and research into policies.
D. Retrospective voting makes it easier to get people to turn out to vote.

Retrospective voting allows voters to assess candidates based on their past performance, making it easier and requiring less research than prospective voting. Voters often find it more straightforward to make decisions based on tangible outcomes. As a result, retrospective voting tends to engage more voters and increase turnout. ;

Answered by GinnyAnswer | 2025-07-03

The average voter engages more in retrospective voting because it requires less research and allows them to assess candidates based on their past actions. This approach can lead to higher voter turnout since individuals often find it easier to relate to past performance. Therefore, the best choice is C: Retrospective voting does not require as much time and research into policies.
;

Answered by Anonymous | 2025-07-04